why the paperwork?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

why the paperwork?

iamsomedude
Administrator
Equity will not complete an imperfect gift

If a donor has made an imperfect gift, i.e. lacking the formalities required at common law, equity will not assist the intended donee.

"The common law derives from the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people, framed by mutual confidence, and sanctioned by the light of reason." ~ US Dept of Justice

this is the why the paperwork? ... For the unification of Common Law with Equity and the why is the paperwork such a pain the ass? is because the formalities required at common law must be observed before equity can assist and Man, in his infinite wisdom, does not trust another man, so the common law is as convoluted as man's own distrust.



The common law is man's law, not Natural Law and certainly NOT God's Law; common law is a DIVISION within the Law and there is to be no division with the body.

Thus, when all these so-called "christian-patriots" are out there promoting that we must go back to Common Law, they are hypocrites and blasphemers for they REJECT the unification of ALL LAW for Reconciliation with God's Law; DEMANDING man's law to be the "voice of reason:" Satanism.

The Law has been fulfilled with the surrender to the will of divine Creator and Acceptance of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior; in other words, one has an integral part to play within both the construction and operation of the universe and if one surrenders to the will of the divine Creator, one will find the light thru the darkness, illuminating the way allowing one to evolve into the Truth; who and what one was created to become, and that Truth shall set one free.

And since The Law has been fulfilled, there is nothing common or unclean which God Almighty had made clean and to speak of the Law as common, is to call something impure that God Almighty has made clean of which means one acts without faith, thus is acts in Sin.
 
 
~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: why the paperwork?

Jo King
"The common law derives from the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people, framed by mutual confidence, and sanctioned by the light of reason." ~ US Dept of Justice

When a federal court makes a ruling called a "holding"  it is said to be common law, so I would say that the common law derives from the will of a federal judge or court.  Does  a federal court determine the will of mankind?  It can't because it is a fiction.  So that must be common law within the realm of a fiction.

  I CAN"T HEAR A FICTION.  I am a Man.  Unlike things ought not to be joined.

The common law of Men is custom and usage, traditions.

Thank you for your thoughts.  We haven't heard from you in a while.
Take the road less traveled
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: why the paperwork?

iamsomedude
Administrator
This post was updated on .
 
 
And exactly how has that line of thinking worked for anyone?

Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye. ~ Mark 7:13



Common Law, even as you have so eloquently described, derives from "custom and usage, traditions" is nothing but the operating rules of an environment defined by Man's reason in whatever capacity he is operating.

For example: On land, an Elephant utilizes the Law of Nature as the basis for its "common law"; to follow the same "common law" within the environment of the water causes the elephant to drown even though the Law of Nature never changed. The elephant can not hold onto its "common law" when the environment changes into one of water, it is FAULTY tradition.

Same thing with you just posted, for in the "real world," man has developed some sort of "common law" NOT based on the Law of Nature, but upon "custom and usage, and traditions" of Man and this "common law" does not translate over into other environments, much like the Elephant's common law.

The "real world" and the "fiction" are just environments in which man operates; each environment has its own set of "rules for this environment," or "common law," defined my the reason of Man and Man alone: fulfilling the wildest of Satan's dreams : fracturing all into confusion, and man does it all himself.


People can keep claiming they don't have to do this and that, and they are right. They can keep ignoring the problem by burrowing their head into the sand and HOPE someone else does it for them, or they can pull their head from their hole, clear the sand from their ears, roll up their sleeves and start doing what is necessary; not for them-self, but for everyone and everything EXCEPT them-self.

One may wish to act like an ostrich, but in this current public environment of promoting liberal homosexuality, is one sure one wants their ass hanging in the breeze like that?
 
People love to reject that part of the Law they with which they do not agree, but they are no longer dealing with some mere "fiction," this the operation of God's Law here on Earth manifest through the State "fiction" and if one "rejects part of the Law, one rejects the whole of the Law" and thus is in insurrection and rebellion against God Almighty of which is manifest here on Earth via insurrection and rebellion against the State "fiction" and now one is "sold into slavery" (monetized debt obligation) to account for the Sin of REJECTION of what God Almighty ordained under Romans 13.

We are seeking to unify the Law on Earth in order to Reconcile man's law with God's Law to create the more perfect union and manifest the Kingdom of Heaven here on Earth and that State apparatus or "fiction" was DESIGNED to be NEUTRAL and if the people can get on the same damn page, we can change our current reality into that which we all wish; RIGHT NOW, those who do not have the people's best interests at heart are in control because they operate COLLECTIVELY in order they profit and gain power INDIVIDUALLY at the expense of the people's futures collectively and individually and one consents when one rejects that "fiction" and "those consenting and those perpetrating are embraced in the same punishment," in this case: a slow, yet ever speeding up, painful decent into hell here on Earth.

And the current operators HOPE and PRAY people keeping thinking the "fiction" does not exist, thus the people will choose to keep their heads in the sand.

It makes fucking them all that easier.




 
~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: why the paperwork?

Fathers son
I feel your frustration my brother, for not all can see as you and I.   its all real yet its not and fake. if you can comprehend this then you are there. or if you can see that all is you and your hearts desires.  literally you heart creates your surrondings.   now you say how. law of attraction. gods laws. you manifest your hearts intent through the fire into creation.    ones paperwork also shows the intent of the author.  so your claim will show your true intent.  common law have fun in that enviroement.  no remedy for you there. read gibsons under the difference between law and equity. wait. ill post it for you

§132.SuitsinChanceryContrastedwithActionsatLaw.—AlitigationintheChanceryCourtisproperlytermeda"suit,'7whileacontestinaCourtoflawisproperlydenominatedan"action."1Thepartywhoinstitutesapro-ceedinginaCourtoflawisordinarilycalled''plaintiff,''whilehewhobeginsasuitinaCourtofChanceryisgenerallycalled"complainant."Thepersonsuediscalled''defendant,''ineachCourt,unlessherespondstoadiscoveryinChancery,inwhichcaseheissometimesdenominated"respondent."InaCourtoflawanactionisbegunbyfilingabondforcostsandsuingoutasum-mons,butinaCourtofChancfiryasuitiscommencedbyfilingabill,thecostbondnotbeingessentialtothebeginningofasuit,asitisintheCircuitCourt.InaCourtoflaw,thefirstpleadingisadeclarationfiledatthereturnterm,couchedinformalandtechnicalphraseology,fullofbombasticverbosity,andteemingwithblood-curdlingdescriptionsofimaginarybarbaritiesinflictedbythewickeddefendant,upontheinnocentandoutragedplaintiff;whileinChancery,thebillisfiledbeforethesubpoenaissues,andisordinarilyaplainstatement,inordinarylanguage,ofcomplainant'srightsinthepremises,andoftheirretention,orviolation,orthreatenedviolation,bythedefendant.In-deed,abillwouldbecorrectlyphrasedwhichdescribedthegroundsofsuitinthemannerandlanguagewhichoneunprofessionalpersonwoulduseinwritingaboutthemtoanother;andsuchwasthecharacterandframeofbillsintheearlyhistoryoftheCourt.2Inanactionatlaw,theevidenceismainlygivenbywitnessesexaminedorallyinopenCourt;whereas,inaChancerysuit,theevidenceismainlycon-tainedindepositionstakeninvacation.InanactionatlawtheissuesoffactraisedbythepleadingsareordinarilydecidedbyajuryunderinstructionsbytheJudge,whileinChancerytheissuesoffactareordinarilyheardandde-terminedbytheChancellor.ACourtoflawregardsforms,rules,andprecedents,whileaCourtofChanceryregardsthecircumstancesofthecase,ignoresiorms,andprefersgoodreasonandgoodconsciencetorulesandprecedents.Inanactionatlaw,thedecision,istermeda"judgment,"ariditeitherawardsasumofmoneyorthepossessionofpropertytotheplaintiff,ortaxestheplain-tiffwiththecostsofthesuit;whilethedecisioninaChancerysuitiscalleda''decree,''2aanditmaynotonlyawardmoneyorpropertytooneormoreofthecomplainants,butmayatthesametimeawardmoneyorpropertytooneormoreofthedefendants,ormayrequireapartytodosomeparticularact,ormayprohibithimfromdoingsomeparticularact,andmaytaxanyofthepartieswiththecosts,ormaydividethecostsamongtheparties.Inanactionatlaw,allpropertytosatisfyajudgmentissoldbytheSheriffunderanexecution,andhereceivesandpaysoverthemoney;butinaChancerysuit,thesalesofproperty,andespeciallyrealproperty,areusuallymadebytheClerkandMaster,andconfirmedbytheChancellor,andtheproceedsofthesalearepaidoutbytheClerkandMaster.Inanactionatlaw,anequitableinterestinpropertyisnotcognizable,andanequitycannotbeleviedonorsold:whereas,inChancery,equitableinterestsaredealtwith,andmaybesold,ortransferred,orconvertedintoalegalestate.AndthereliefsthetwoCourtsgrantareverydissimilar.Courtsoflawhaveadistinctformofactiontoredresseachwrongandasserteachright;whereas,inChanceryseveralwrpngsmayberedressedandseveralrightsas-sertedinoneandthesamesuit.Thus,inthesamesuittheChanceryCourtmay:1,staywaste;2,impoundtheproceedsofthewaste;3,awarddamagesforthewastecommitted;4,adjudgethelandtothecomplainant;5,givehimadecreeforbackrents,and6,puthiminpossessionoftheproperty;whereas,alawCourtwouldrequirefourdifferentactions,andaninjunctioninChancerybesides,toaccomplishthesameresults.Inanactionatlawtheplaintiffmustsueforeitherpropertyormoney;inasuitinChancerythecomplainantmaysueforboththepropertyanditsmoneyvalue,inthealternative,andifhe-failtogetthepropertytheCourtwillinapropercase,awardamoneyequivalent.Inanactionatlawyougetwhatthelawallows,inasuitinChanceryyougetwhatisjustandright,accordingtoEquityandgoodconscience.Thelawmayberight,Equityisrightitself.3§133.HowaSuitinChanceryisCommenced.

forgive the spacing. was copied and pasted
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: why the paperwork?

derek moran
In reply to this post by iamsomedude
Psalms 98:9

“Before the LORD; for he cometh to judge the earth: with righteousness shall he judge the world, and the people with equity.”

King James Version (KJV)

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Psalms-98-9/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: why the paperwork?

Sue Em
In reply to this post by iamsomedude
iamsomedude wrote
The Law has been fulfilled with the surrender to the will of divine Creator and Acceptance of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior; in other words, one has an integral part to play within both the construction and operation of the universe and if one surrenders to the will of the divine Creator, one will find the light thru the darkness, illuminating the way allowing one to evolve into the Truth; who and what one was created to become, and that Truth shall set one free.

And since The Law has been fulfilled, there is nothing common or unclean which God Almighty had made clean and to speak of the Law as common, is to call something impure that God Almighty has made clean of which means one acts without faith, thus is acts in Sin.
Wow - that clarified a lurking thought process!!

One comment - the people in Lev 27:2 are referred to as the common people - literal meaning 'the people of the land', which of course man is by virtue of the creation of Adam from dry earth and the eviction of man back to the earth outside the garden.

So common law is the "law of the people of the land".   Hence the "law of the land".  And of course, the earth is the repository of death.

Given the people are created from the dry earth and life comes from the breath of God - we ALL have 2 laws fighting for attention in each of us - the law of the land AND the law of life.

Comes back to the simple principle of choosing the law under which you will operate - either life or death.

And as you stated, it also involves a surrender - God had told Adam death would be the result of eating from the tree, so the bite of the apple completed that contract.  

New contract - the surrender to Jesus, restores man to life back in 'the garden' in God's presence.  

Simple.  Live in the old contract or accept the new - life or death.  

The Law of War and Peace (1625)
BY HUGO GROTIUS
BOOK 3, CHAPTER 9
On Postliminy