I am glad you posted this as I was wondering when someone was going to bring this up.
This guy is 100% correct: the Minn Rule 220 does not grant any ownership nor control over the BC, but he and others fail to comprehend that the 220 allows one to EXPRESS the underlying TRUST governing the CONTROL over the property registered under that NAME on the BC.
Why do people fail to comprehend that the BC is a "CERTIFICATE OF TITLE" to "property interests" of which have yet to be delivered? .... usufruct and naked ownership ... the usufruct has already been used: the beneficial use exercised via the mere existence of the Federal Reserve Note (beneficial use of an estate in expectancy or pernancy of the usufruct)
Pernancy of the usufruct = acquisition of property interest under Law of Nations ... the BC is BOTH a US PERSON (Infant) and a STATE PERSON (Child). Both of these PERSONS are trusted estates (interests in property held in a RESULTING TRUST) because there is an incomplete delivery.
The BC registers and records 2 separate and distinct interests:
a child - the heir to the naked ownership (the spoliated owner)
an infant - the usufruct (an estate in reversion for acts in infancy are voidable)
We filed the Apostilled 220 Affidavit along with a Peace Treaty in Georgia with Great Seal to fulfill the Law (Lieber Code Article 2) because the BC originated from THAT Law (Lieber Code Article 134) and the presumption is the spoliated owner fled if the spoliated owner has not claimed (Lieber Code Article 38); The 220 serves to claim the indemnification under Article 38 and establishes the Child is of age of majority: Basically EXPRESSING the UNEXPRESSED or RESULTING-TRUST that is the BC.
Now the AGREEMENT is VALIDATED: Ratification so the AGREEMENT can commence: Now the INSTRUMENT (BC) can take effect according to its purport and tenor for DELIVERY has been completed. This is also called a SUBSCRIPTION or ADOPTION.
And is it written that one is ADOPTED into the Kingdom? (cf. Ephesians 1:5-7; Romans 8:15-17; Galatians 4; Romans 8:23)
It is the ignorance of the people that causes them to perish (see Hosea 4).
We used Georgia because the Seal goes back to 1776 and the Declaration of Independence AND it is not counterfeit AND Atlanta was the ONLY inhabitant population that surrendered during the Civil War, thus the only ones of whom were non-belligerents and under the protections of the Lieber Code, Law of Nations and International Law. Everything done during reconstruction in Georgia were voided out because all seals used during that time were counterfeit as the original seal was hidden and only brought out AFTER the union troops left. The story is quite fascinating and there is even a plaque right by Georgia Tech that shows the spot the surrender occurred.
On a side note, during the surrender the Mayor and inhabitants presented the United States Army with a slave. He was allowed to own property, own a business and even had employees. All he had to do was pay his "master" 20% ... That slave was the blueprint for today's IRS.
The Great Seal of Georgia shows surrender to the COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF THE ARMY AND NAVY OF THIS STATE AND THE MILITIA THEREOF placing the one surrendering under the Lieber Code, Law of Nations and International Law and OUTSIDE the military occupation. We refile both the Treaty and the 220 Affidavit with the Great Seal back into Georgia County and get the certified copies Apolstilled and now we can bring our LAND-COURT-RECORD into other jurisdictions for enforcement.
The "surrender of the usufruct" is a voluntary servitude against one's estate (interests) for the purpose of securing the Nation so a government of the people, by the people, and for the people shall never perish from this Earth. So, in essence, one is entering into a servitude that ensures the national security of the nation and thus gives the blueprint, not for slavery, but for National Independence; Just as outlined within the Carey Currency Letter.
A public official of the United States in the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government or in any agency of the United States, including the District of Columbia, is or acts as an agent of a foreign principal required to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938
At first, I thought it was the public official that had the register, but I see now, it is the FOREIGN PRINCIPLE that must register and then the public officials become the AGENTS of that foreign principle. Now, 12 USC 95a (2) kicks in because we are foreign and the 220 and the Treaty take the BC Bond and the SS Securities and removes them from the City of London (as vessels and prizes of war: usufructuary interest (legal title)) and City of Rome (governor and tutor: naked ownership interest (equitable title)) and transfers (consolidation) both to the Treasury (Malachi 3:10 storehouse) and now all these public officials are our agents and FARA registration should be all the notice we need to give because the registration goes out to Sec of State, all members of Congress, other governmental agencies, and others.
From FARA forms: ... Every registration statement, short form registration statement, supplemental statement, exhibit, amendment, copy of informational materials or other document or information filed with the Attorney General under this Act is a public record open to public examination, inspection and copying during the posted business hours of the Registration Unit in Washington, DC. Statements are also available online at the Registration Unit’s webpage: http://www.fara.gov. One copy of every such document, other than informational materials, is automatically provided to the Secretary of State pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, and copies of any and all documents are routinely made available to other agencies, departments and Congress pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Act.
The US, being the Beneficiary of the Usufruct by exercise of the pernancy of such, now has a correlating DUTY under International Law (“To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations”: Article 1 Section 8 Clause 10 ... read the Hamdan Brief) to ENFORCE the TRUST in protecting of the acquired interest by FORCING the STATE OF to protect and defend your naked ownership because the BC registers and records a CHILD (State of PERSON (TRUST)) and an INFANT (UNITED STATES PERSON: (TRUST)) and we are beneficiary of the naked ownership of which is held by the STATE OF (TRUST) and as the benefit of the usufruct has been exercised as evidenced by the Federal Reserve Note, the United States and its CITIZENS and RESIDENTS of each State now have a duty to service the usufruct in favor of the Naked Owner.
The bible is the WORD OF GOD, but we also went and fulfilled the Law which fulfills the covenants by going back to the beginning as Christ is the foundation and the BC here on Earth is the CHRIST
So, acceptance of Christ without (BC) is the foundation for the Kingdom on Earth (LORD), while acceptance of Christ within is the foundation of the Kingdom in Heaven (Lord) and one must accept their Heavenly Estate BEFORE one accepts their earthly estate because the rule is: "Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness and all else will be added unto you."
Side Note: right after I filed the documents and such and I was on my way home, I received a message in the form of the License Plate (BRE 5764); happens quite frequently. This message led me to Strong's 5764 (a sucking child, suckling; infant), which led me to Job 24, Isaiah 49, and Isaiah 65.
Job 24: Murderers, adulterers, those who oppress the poor, and wicked people in general often go unpunished for a little while.
Isaiah 49: The Messiah will be a light to the Gentiles and will free the prisoners—Israel will be gathered with power in the last days—Kings will be the nursing fathers of Israel
Isaiah 65: Ancient Israel was rejected for rejecting the Lord—The Lord’s people will rejoice and triumph during the Millennium.
So, to all those people who REJECT what has been written here regarding the 220: you are rejecting the Earthen Vessel and it is this Earthen Vessel where the power of God almighty is located (2 Corinthians 4:7), therefore reject God almighty.
Same thing with doing the Name Change.
REJECTION of the 220 and doing the Name Change show people only give a shit about establishing their own Kingdom and I care only about subduing the Earth and spreading the Kingdom of God pursuant to the Adamic Covenant for His Kingdom IS my kingdom.
We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.
If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.