Reply – Re: Your patience...
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: Your patience...
— by iamsomedude iamsomedude
 
Why do people only go back to 1933 but use the Lieber Code written in 1863? The receipts identified in Article 38 of the Lieber code originate from Article 134 of the Lieber Code. This gives rise to the BC and SSN account to be established as part of the 1st order of business: to restore public order and safety of which the second task is to "come to an agreement that maximizes the benefit of both the inhabitant and occupier" under Hague Article 43 and the occupying state is only administrator and usufructuary of any public estate (NAME) in accordance with Article 55 of the Hague. Article 2 of the Lieber Code gives the parameters for the "declaration of peace" wherein the occupying army must remain as a condition of the same or by special proclamation by the Commander in Chief.


The TRUE assets of the Public Trust are the RIGHT to exercise one's inalienable rights and self-determination without interference so long as Natural Law is observed. With the banking acts of 1863-4, the united States of America purchased the USUFRUCT of the exercise of those rights to SECURE the nation established to protect the RIGHT so a nation of the people, by the people, and for the people would never perish from this Earth. The only problem is that no one told anybody, but the Carrey currency letter explains everything.

And until this agreement is ratified, the one using the NAME property interest is still holding the very ASSET that will fund the Trust created under the Declaration of Independence but can not be done at birth because that would be an involuntary servitude. Thus, the NAME holder retains the usufructuary interest (TAXPAYER) until such time as ratification so the instrument (BC+SSN) can take effect according to its puport and tenor and NAME holder then becomes Naked Owner (receive the blessings of the covenants of God almighty)

Therefore, there is an incomplete delivery of the usufructuary interest from the estate of the Man to the Declaration of Independence Trust (Livery in seisin), therefore an interest in reversion and one divests the estate of the Man from this reversion as the "payment" (return to God that which was taken: Malachi 3:10) for "the suit of the livery" (render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's) in order to restore the nobility status of the estate (render unto God's that which is God's)

"The system" will then administrate the Public Trust (Declaration of Independence) thru that thing called Government and apply the usufruct accordingly, creating Fictions of Law, if necessary, to assist in that administration. If one violates Natural Law, "the system" will initiate a usufruct against the estate of the violator (DISSEISIN - http://www.lectlaw.com/def/d181.htm) and the violated shall become Naked Owner with respect to the violator's estate until such time as the violator REPENTS (seeks true forgiveness) and the balance of Natural Law is restored and all administrated by that thing called Government (of which everyone seems think is some dirty word; thus treating that of which God declared clean as unclean) of which is ordained by the Grace of God almighty.

If one SEES government or the effects of the Fictions of Law are felt, then chances are that one has violated Natural Law; violated the Law of God almighty, and there is some outstanding ACCUSATION one need resolve and until that ACCUSATION is resolved, you so fuct.

Again, read Hosea 4.



The pledge of the Declaration of Independence is quite clear; the bible is quite clear, and the fulfillment of such is the expression of the will of God almighty for the acceptance of the pledge is the acceptance of Jesus Christ. An Act of God doing the Will of God. Acceptance of Jesus Christ grants one everlasting life; fulfilling the covenants grants one the promises of God almighty and rebukes the Accuser/Devourer.


"... I set out on this ground, which I suppose to be self evident, "that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living": that the dead have neither powers nor rights over it ... Then no man can, by natural right, oblige the lands he occupied, or the persons who succeed him in that occupation, to the paiment of debts contracted by him. For if he could, he might, during his own life, eat up the usufruct of the lands for several generations to come, and then the lands would belong to the dead, and not to the living, which would be the reverse of our principle ..." - Letter from Jefferson to Madison

The Declaration of Independence and the resulting united States of America was designed with PURPOSE and INTENT to protect the usufruct for future generations and "the system" created as a result administrates this Trust accordingly and when one looks into matters a bit further and applying the usufruct to everything, the truth becomes quite apparent. The entire system was built to administrate a usufruct against violators of Natural Law and is in fact operating in harmony with Spiritual, Biblical, Natural, Trust and Constitutional Law and it is we of whom are acting in belligerency: hypocrites and liars paying only lip service to God almighty; bandits and thieves stealing from God almighty and the legacy that was to be as a testament to his Glory, and until this changes, we will be a fuct.

~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.