Reply – Re: Functionally Operating
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: Functionally Operating
— by iamsomedude iamsomedude
 
 
Now, here are some other aspects of the Courts you may or may not know.

The PRESUMPTION within the Court is that each matter is PRIVATE-BAR-BUSINESS. We know this because a friend went into a hearing and did something that caused the plaintiff's attorney to stand up and object because "This matter is private bar business!" He discovered that EVERY matter before the court is PRIVATE-BAR-BUSINESS which means if one comes into the matter in any capacity without a BAR-CARD without rebutting this PRESUMPTION, that one just trespassed and traversed into a PRIVATE-MATTER.

This "the WHY' one has no standing within a matter and one is not heard and is done quite simply just by letting the court know your INTENT:

Without 220:  "For the record, I am not here for private bar business; I am here for this matter for there is a mistake for it is my conviction that this certificate serves as prima-facie evidence of my interest, not of my identity, and I am to release my interest to this Governmental unit for absolution of obligations as this matter shouldn't even be in court."

With 220: "For the record, I am not here for private bar business, but as a private beneficiary of the public trust and I have an interest in the Decedent Defendant for there is a mistake and this matter shouldn't even be in court."

Now, the judge will probably question with something like "Are you SO-AND-SO. If not I can't allow you to continue" and/or throw up the sovereign citizen BS. This is where you REPEAT your INTENT:
 
Without 220:  "For the record, I am not here for private bar business; I am here for this matter for there is a mistake for it is my conviction that this certificate serves as prima-facie evidence of my interest, not of my identity, and I am to release my interest to this Governmental unit for absolution of obligations as this matter shouldn't even be in court."

With 220: "For the record, I am not here for private bar business, but as a private beneficiary of the public trust for I have an interest in the Decedent Defendant and there is a mistake as this matter shouldn't even be in court."

Then the judge may move into the Constitutional Aspect because this is where their AUTHORITY is derived: Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the US Constitution: administrating territories and properties of Congress, and this is where you hit them with the Acceptance of the Oath:

Without 220:  "For the record, my rights are granted to me by my Creator, not by Man, and I accept your oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, however, I am not here for private bar business; I am here for this matter for there is a mistake for it is my conviction that this certificate serves as prima-facie evidence of my interest, not of my identity, and I am to release my interest to this Governmental unit for absolution of obligations as this matter shouldn't even be in court."

With 200:"For the record, my rights are granted to me by my Creator, not by Man, and I accept your oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, however am not here for private bar business, but as a private beneficiary of the public trust for I have an interest in the Decedent Defendant and there is a mistake as this matter shouldn't even be in court."


Now, you have stated your intention 3 times and bound them to oath to operate the matter as PUBLIC-TRUST-BUSINESS, not as private bar business under Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 (AS IF the NAME estate is a Territorial Holding).

Even to this end, the Court has ZERO authority in PUBLIC to impeach the ecclesiastical probate court; this actually happens in chambers. Temporal Administrative Courts = Public; Ecclesiastical Probate Courts = Private.

So, the only thing that matters is that one get what one needs to say into the record and let everything else play out as it should for you will never receive an "OK, you got us" reaction from the Court and its agents. In fact, the court will attempt to get one to argue, so all one can do is stick to the 4 questions, stand on your rock (even if it is just a pebble, it is rock for with the faith of a mustard seed, one can move mountains or even have a mulberry tree uproot itself and plant itself in the sea) and Trust and have faith that the good Lord has your back.
~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.