D--- Could be you’re right, I don’t really follow this? How is it that claiming inheritance =circumcision? The uncircumcised gentiles are also under the law. Our problem is that we are not yet free, and Paul is talking here to those who are. Galatians 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
B -- Like you have written, we have taken what does not belong to us = the false inheritance or the usufruct of the societal usufruct (society is the RESULT our Dominion: usufruct of our original usufruct of the Earth), thus when we did not place the tithing into the storehouse, we circumcised ourself from our Father's heavenly estate in exchange for the bowl of porridge (usufruct of a usufruct via LICENSE).
D -- Don’t agree with this ... prove 974 8798 me now herewith 2063, saith 559 8804 the LORD 3068 of hosts 6635, if I will not open 6605 8799 you the windows 699 of heaven 8064, and pour you out 7324 8689 a blessing 1293, that [there shall] not [be room] enough 1767 [to receive it].
B -- That whole passage does not appear to be temptation of the Lord, but an offer from the Lord to "challenge" or have him "fulfill on his word" (prove me now herewith
) ... this would be akin to taking the Birth Certificate (and Minn Rule 220 filing: acceptance) to the Probate Court of the County of Birth (head probate judge appears to be the trustee) and informing that court that you have not abandoned your claim (presumed dead or missing: spoliated owner has fled) to that beneficial interest and "Age of majority" (no longer a child) but that you wish that interest go into the storehouse (for safekeeping: delivery) as that is the will of our Father and his will is my will (surrender: rely on 100% faith AS would a child to any promise made by a Father) and the CHALLENGE is to release the hard lock or open the doors to the kingdom so that one may enter (blessings pour out
And as revelations 2:10 states ... "be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life" ... this is why the probate court ... the NAME is a DEAD ENTITY (dead account) until it receives an infusion of life (again rev 2:10); Christ and his spirit are reunited in Hades (land of the Dead: corporation heaven), thus Christ (NAME) can now rise from the dead since one "performed the sacrifice" (surrender of beneficial interest to the storehouse) ... it is the SACRIFICE that INSURES the TRANSACTION be COMPLETED as the SURRENDER is the CONSIDERATION. (watch last 10-15 minutes of Constantine)
Not sure how the Crown set-up New Zealand, but it appears the united States has been set up to protect the ORIGINAL usufruct of the earth (dominion as stated in Genesis) from the dead (those that would waste it for future generations) (see the letter from Jefferson to Madison) and the dead have no rights.
So, it appears the people of the united States were basically EVICTED from the Land after the Civil War (For you know that it was not with perishable things such as silver or gold that you were redeemed from the empty way of life handed down to you from your ancestors (1 Peter 1:18)
FOR Ye have sold yourselves for nought; and ye shall be redeemed without money (Isaiah 52:3)
AND Your wealth and your treasures I will give as plunder, without charge, because of all your sins throughout your country (Jeremiah 15:13)
) and are not allowed to return until such time as they accept the new constitution (read Attorney General opinion of 1868) of which would be akin to accepting (surrendering to) Christ for NAME = CHRIST.
The Gettysburg Address places the government of the people, by the people, and for the people into TRUST and is modeled after the 2 examples of Trust in the bible: Psalm 23 and the Lord's Prayer.
The Birth Certificate is a receipt for indemnification issued to the spoliated owner provided that spoliated owner has not fled (abandoned the claim or presumed dead) ... This would mean that the people would have to first surrender their beneficial interest to the Treasury (in acceptance the New Constitution: surrender = acceptance + delivery), then challenge the State to recognize what has been done (prove me now herewith
) so the blessing may pour out
, because much like all these international treaties, none of this seems to be self executing.
D -- This approach is not humbling yourself as a little child ...
B -- sure it is ... relying on 100% faith.
That is the very essence of humbling yourself as a little child ... Correct me if I am mistaken as I have not read the whole of the Bible, but it appears one is to be as wise as serpent but as harmless as a dove and to come AS a child, but no where have I found that it states to BE a child.
And if Peter is addressing those who are free in Galatians 5, then I can safely presume, one was not free before Galatians 5 and Galatians 4:1-7 What I am saying is that as long as the heir is a child, he is no different from a slave, although he is the owner of everything. He is subject to guardians and trustees until the date set by his father.
So also, when we were children, we were enslaved under the basic principles of the world. But when the time had fully come, God sent His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law, to redeem those under the Law, that we might receive our adoption as sons. And because you are sons, God sent the Spirit of His Son
(Christ's Sacrifice for the Blood of Christ (life force: consciousness) now runs thru our veins) into our hearts, crying out, “Abba, Father!” So you are no longer a slave, but a son; and since you are a son, you are also an heir through God.
It appears Galatians 5 is a WARNING: "You got your Mulligan; let's not do this shit again, OK?"
We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.
If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.