Then go look up: Accession and Depositary
Then read this
When reading this article, keep in mind 63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, §247
“As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised in behalf of the government or of all citizens who may need the intervention of the officer.
Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever level of government, and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people,
and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts...
 and owes a fiduciary duty to the public...
 It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual.
 Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official who tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy. Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit-and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears [483 U. S. 372] in the statute.
See United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir1985) includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public, ... and if he deliberately conceals material information from them, he is guilty of fraud. McNally v United States 483 U.S. 350 (1987) [Emphasis added]
now, read this
What you will see is that when you all are using these Auth BC (evidence of interest held in trust), you can not just file them into the court case, that would be a tacit agreement that you agree to the debt collection attempt because you participated.
What you do to overcome the appearance of participation
is to SPECIAL DEPOSIT your LIVING TRUST with the court (Accession by Depositary) thus transforming the judge and its officers into DE FACTO TRUSTEE because "A person is a de facto trustee where the person (1) assumed the office of trustee under a color of right or title and (2) exercised the duties of the office. A person assumes the position of trustee under color of right or title where the person asserts “an authority that was derived from an election or appointment, no matter how irregular the election or appointment might be.” A de facto trustee’s good-faith actions are binding on third persons. Because the purported successor trustee in Allen Trust acted as trustee and assumed its office through an appointment it reasonably believed to be effective, it was a de facto trustee and was entitled to compensation for its services.
Now, we use a UCC Filing in conjunction with an ABSTRACT OF TRUST and file those into the county and then get a certified copy out and place it with the court. You can email it to the court for email IS proof of service according to Supreme Court rulings.
The filing itself PREFECTS the GRANT of the estate to you and shows you completed delivery as GRANTEE by nominating the trustees; thus GRANTING USUFRUCT back to the ISSUER (as GRANTEE) of the TRUST CERTIFICATE (Auth BC).
"Delivery includes surrender and acceptance, and both are necessary to its completion. This must be the result of a contract — the meeting of two minds, the accord of two wills. The grantor must be willing and agree to deliver, and the grantee must be willing and consent to receive and this accord of wills must be evidenced in some way, to show the unequivocal intention of both parties that the instrument shall take effect according to its purport and tenor." … 15 Idaho at 228-229, 96 P. at 938 (emphasis added)Here is the UCC filing I have in place.
If you do not know how to do an abstract of trust, go here and begin reading
Now, the court and its officers have something to administrate AND they do it or become liable to you or the loss.
hope this helps
We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.
If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.
First go back and listen to the audios with the DC Attorney ... Then go listen to the 2 audios with RB from Montana (dec 2 and the most recent: July 2).