Reply – Re: CR(tm) "process"
Your Name
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: CR(tm) "process"
— by iamsomedude iamsomedude
Yes, "the acceptance language goes on the front of the first page of the collection attempt and the endorsement language goes on the (reverse side of) last page of said collection attempt."

The stamps go on the AFV/RFV as well for you are basically turning that Doc into a "Foreign Bonded Bill of Exchange" via the Stamps (SSN no dashes = "withdrawal bond Number") and this is what Binds the Exchange via De-Facto Surety for negotiation so one can acquire the Interest for Delivery to the Treasury.

So, the FIRST CR(tm) letter and AFV/RFV is sent to the "tax collector" of which is the one servicing the Debt Obligation. The AFV/RFV should be used by this PERSON as a "deferred income tax asset"  due to the nature of the ONGOING duties of the Usufructuary of which are: 1. To take good care of the things subject to the usufruct. 2. To pay all taxes, and claims which arise while the thing is in his possession, as a ground-rent and 3. To keep the thing in repair at his own expense.

In accounting, Prepaid Income Tax is defined as an asset listed on the balance sheet that represents taxes that have been already paid despite not yet having been incurred. It is also called a deferred income tax asset.

Prepaid Income Tax Explanation. Prepaid income tax is a form of prepaid expense. The most common reason why prepayment on income taxes occurs is due to over-estimation of tax deposits. ... Either it results in a tax refund or the credit written off towards the tax liability of the next period.

The difference between prepaid income tax and a deferred tax asset is that prepaid income tax occurs within one year. Conversely, a deferred income tax asset can occur for a period of longer than one year.

Thus the Second CR(tm) letter is a result of the REPUDIATION of the Hague Article 43 "Agreement" that ESTABLISHES the peace and operates pursuant to Hague Article 55; thus a Declaration of War or Dishonor, and since the one making the claim has failed to provide proof of a RIGHT to compel performance NOR shown where the consideration tender (AFV/RFV) is insufficient, then that one brings a FALSE CLAIM under the False Claims Act on March 2, 1863, 12 Stat. 696, for "knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval" thus is now indebted to the United States (ie: Lord of Hosts) "in the amount not less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000, as adjusted by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note; Public Law 104–410), plus 3 times the amount of damages which the Government sustains because of the act."

The Final CR(tm) is the "restoration of the peace" thru Surety Substitution. This is where one shed the De-Facto Surety thru a Bill of Exchange underwritten by the Debt Obligation arising thru the False Claim instead of the "SSN-no-dashes withdraw Bond" (ie: no-dash-ssn above the stamp) rendering the one(s) bringing the False Claim as surety for the settlement of the claim and since "none can profit from their own wrong," that one is now personally liable for the damages as usufructuary of the Treasury as a BELLIGERENT-WAR-REBEL and thus "indebted to" the Lord of Hosts for the SIN of "bearing false witness."

~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.