Reply – Re: The Simplistic Nature of CR(tm)
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: The Simplistic Nature of CR(tm)
— by Rschallmo Rschallmo
Previously in debt collection court cases, I would state in open court that " The Plaintiff is a fictitious entity and its attorneys are practicing law without a license. That's  contemp of court". I would also mention 18 USC 4 Misprision of felony. Worked every time.