Reply – Courts are Conservators of the Peace
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Courts are Conservators of the Peace
— by iamsomedude iamsomedude
Again: "I helped him find his own words by starting with some of mine." : Sean Connery as William Forrester in Finding Forrester (2000) ... As promised, here are the examples, and I am trusting you guys to do your due diligence.  


********************************************************

Ok, here is how we approached the US District court regarding the Public Defender ...


This is a notice to you, PD_Name and any and all successors, of my surrender under International Law pursuant to the guidelines as subscribed by the United States within FM27-10, Lieber Code, Hague, Geneva and Vienna Conventions, and International Convention on Civil and Political Rights.

As you are aware, this matter is not a private bar matter and pursuant to these guidelines and as an appointed Adviser under the United Nations to ensure Public Order and Safety by ensuring these matters remain free from any and all human rights abuses and/or criminal activity, you are now required to deliver this surrender to the court and if you fail to understand or otherwise fail to deliver, you are advised to seek competent International legal counsel as to your liability under International Law as subscribed and set forth within the Nuremberg Principles.



********************************************************

And here is the letter crafted for delivery by the Attorney / Public Defender ... This one should also be good to use for Supreme Court, just modify it accordingly for if there was an order issued, then "there is a mistake and time is of the essence ... "


Time is of the Essence and I am prepared to settle this matter honorably, however before we continue; will “the PLAINTIFF_NAME” certify my Right of Subrogation and do so in writing please?

Otherwise, I do not consent to these proceedings nor consent to being surety for this case for I believe I do have a right to subrogation being denied and demand the bond be immediately brought forward, so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged, unless of course, this Court can provide proof of claim to the contrary along with all the facts and law relied upon along with the proof of claim as to the nature and cause of the charges AND define the Thing sought for payment AND proof of claim “the COURT-NAME-HERE” constitutes one of competent jurisdiction AND proof of claim TICKET ISSUER (officer name) who initiated action has both authority and jurisdiction to initiate action along with all the facts and law relied upon;

ELSE it appears there is universal agreement that there fails to be any claim stated upon which the relief enforced by “the PLAINTIFF” should be granted as NAME AS CHARGED stands in full acquittance and discharge for all purposes of this obligation for any further collection and/or enforcement attempt would amount to Breach of Peace and Contract and this Court shall adopt and issue order for the same, unless of course, this Court can provide proof of claim to the contrary along with all the facts and law relied upon.



********************************************************

And here is the one we used for the Federal Court:

Mandatory Judicial Notice

Writ of Mandamus

Since the court, its officers, and its Prosecutors Prosecutor-name(s)-here-if-known are conservators of the peace and the APPOINTED attorney, Attorney-Name-Here and/or his successor(s) is an “officer/employee of the United States” by virtue of his “oath to uphold and defend the Laws and Constitution of the United States” and the attorney’s first duty is to the Court (See Corpus Juris Secundum, Annex A), then Attorney-Name-Here, and/or his successor(s), now has a DUTY owed to both this Court and “the PLAINTIFF” to take the offer of peace to “the PLAINTIFF” of whom is now compelled to answer and provide proof of claim the consideration tender is insufficient AND define the Thing demanded for payment along with the proof of claim the court constituted is one of competent jurisdiction AND that the Attorney(s) bringing claim has authority and jurisdiction to bring claim along with all facts and law relied upon; ELSE there would be universal agreement that Name-as-Charged stands in full acquittance and discharge for all purposes of this obligation for any further collection attempt would amount to Breach of Peace/Contract and pursuant to 28 USC 1361, the United States district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the Plaintiff, unless of course, this Court can provide proof of claim along with all the facts and law relied upon to the contrary.

~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.