Reply – Re: US Constitution and Jurisdiction
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: US Constitution and Jurisdiction
— by iamsomedude iamsomedude
Let's take it further ...


exequatur = an official recognition by a government of a consul, agent, or other representative of a foreign state, authorizing them to exercise the duties of office.

United States Government is foreign corporation with respect to the States
 but pays for the registration of the Birth Event via Social Security Act of 1935 AND the Government was formed for WHAT purpose?

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed - Declaration of Independence

it behooves us to remember that men can never escape being governed. Either they must govern themselves or they must submit to being governed by others. If from lawlessness or fickleness, from folly or self- indulgence, they refuse to govern themselves, then most assuredly in the end they will have to be governed from the outside. They can prevent the need of government from without only by showing that they possess the power of government from within. A sovereign can not make excuses for his failures; a sovereign must accept the responsibility for the exercise of the power that inheres in him; and where, as is true in our Republic, the people are  sovereign, then the people must show a sober under standing and a sane and steadfast purpose if they
are to preserve that orderly liberty upon which as a foundation every republic must rest. - Teddy Roosevelt, AT THE OPENING OF THE JAMESTOWN EXPOSITION, APRIL 26, 1907


The Law of Nations is VERY clear on the duties of the foreigner @ Book 2, Articles 104-105 and the duties of the Host Nation @ Book 2, Articles 109-110 with regards to the foreigner and if one has not taken oath pursuant to 2 Stat 153, "and not otherwise," then one is NOT a citizen of the Host Nation by maxim of law; foreigner, but granted hospitality within the host nation under a State of Emergency due to Lieber Code Articles 7 and 134.

Therefore, it appears to me that the Birth Certificate is an exequatur; the receipt for indemnification issued pursuant to Article 38 of the Lieber Code, thus the District court would be the court of ORIGINAL jurisdiction for claims against one with a BC; if the claim did not originate from the District court, it is 100% administrative and none of your concern as the matter relates to the usufructuary duty of the State; the rest is trickery and deceit that the ignorant allow to happen to themselves for they know not God in their hearts and have become reprobate in their being.

It is not that one is being governed thru the BC, it is that one can "govern them-self thru the BC" (using it as a conduit for the expansion of His Kingdom) because that "fiction of law" was created for a beneficial purpose of which can not be defeated; the funding of the Trusted Nation of which the BC is part and parcel.


The supreme Court is for claims against ambassadors and one really can not be an ambassador for Christ until all their allegiances with Caesar (ACCUSATIONS) be settled. So it appears that if one currently has a mortgage, District court is STILL where one would go be ALL banking issues arise from the Laws of the United States for the Federal Reserve was created by Act of Congress.

The bankers and these other commercial entities have purchased the USUFRUCT of the people by the mere exercise of the right thru the debt-based system (ie: FRN is evidence of such: realization of the expectancy), thus now have a DUTY to return the right of subrogation in exchange as security which amounts to naked ownership so we can dispose of that same property as the Fee-Owner because the rule of usufruct is that the "substance of the thing subject to the usufruct can not be impaired" and the Fee-Owner has superior claim (ie: foreign beneficiary of the republican form of government); but ONLY with your consent, which is where the AFV/RFV seal the deal.

This all the MIRROR image of the Court of Heaven; One must REBUKE the ACCUSOR and how does one do that other than walking the path of truth as it appears to one and then asking "show me otherwise" before one's claim to the Kingdom be considered.




~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.