Reply – The Simplistic Nature of CR(tm)
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
The Simplistic Nature of CR(tm)
— by iamsomedude iamsomedude
It appears that people still do not comprehend the SIMPLISTIC nature of the CR™ process, so here is some of the WORKINGS of it behind the scenes. Remember, this is the PHILOSOPHY behind the CR™ “process” and not to be confused with actual “process” … “process” is handled within the operation of the CR™ as Trust Protector (ie: Foreign Beneficiary to protect the Public Trust), and this post is by no means exhaustive; just overview.

27 CFR 72.11 DEFINITIONS: Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime.

27 CFR 19.170-19.172 Relief from Surety: one signs ACCEPTANCE by way of accommodation, thus becomes DE-FACTO surety and has an equitable right of subrogation that must be removed

Initial Acceptances are PAY TO THE ORDER of  FIRST MIDDLE LAST for one must take possession FIRST before one may transfer (maxim of law: right must accrue to one first) and the ensure the transfer is complete with zero encumbrances, one executes the CR™ to show there is no further outstanding debt and that all parties are in compliance with 12 USC § 95 (2) (40 Stat 411) then one Accepts for Value the finished CR™ “process,” makes it payable to the US Treasury; to and for the account of the United States, underwriting the issuance of the 12 USC § 343 Bill of Exchange to facilitate the transfer: credits FIRST MIDDLE LAST for the acquittance and discharge from further obligation while at the same time, transferring the DEBT OBLIGATION to the United States (ie: enforcement of the Peace).

Now when there is no proof of claim with warrant going back to the Treasury, then the matter before the court (or being collected) is a “counterfeit security” in that the one bringing the claim is attempting to “fabricate a claim where none existed” (barratry) in an attempt to “falsify a bounty contract” (counterfeiting) and according to the Hamdan Brief: … in United States v. Arjona, 120 U.S. 479 (1887) … reasoning that “if the thing made punishable is one which the United States are required by their international obligations to use due diligence to prevent, it is an offense against the law of nations.” … This Court has also recognized that the Define and Punish Clause “authorizes Congress to derive from the often broadly phrased principles of international law a more precise code . . . necessary to bring the United States into compliance with rules governing the international community.” Finzer, 798 F.2d at 1455 … In a series of tribunal decisions, treaties, and other authoritative pronouncements, the international community has made it plain that directly facilitating acts of terrorism and other war crimes cannot be tolerated.

This “Bounty Counterfeiting” results DIRECTLY into an act of Kidnapping and then conscripts the one so kidnapped into a military operation against one’s host nation for now one is FORCED to utilize PRIVATE Bank Notes which result in a DEBT BURDEN upon the inhabitants of the country so occupied (ie: falsified Bounty contract PAID = False Flag Operation of which stands FORBIDDEN by Papal Decree (ie: their God)); direct opposition to the restoration of public order and safety; against the PRINCIPLES upon which this nation was founded (ie: read Letter from Jefferson to Madison AGAIN), for even though Martial Law may remain in effect until peace can be FULLY restored, rape, pillage, and plunder are FORMALLY prohibited.

NOTE: The absence of the proof of claim along with the Treasury warrant (ie: facts and laws relied upon) renders the debt collection attempt into FORCED COMMERCIAL INTERCOURSE (ie: forced prostitution) or RAPE and the DEMAND for payment is nothing more than "procurement, pandering and solicitation" (ie: pillage and plunder) at that point, transforming the entire debt collection attempt into a Commercial Crime (ie: Conduct Unbecoming).

This is all done in violation of Book 3, Article 15 of the Law of Nations AND is also done in violation of the Nuremberg Principles AND in violation of Articles 44 and 45 of the Hague Convention AND in violation of Treaty of Ghent; along with numerous others Treaty and International Law violations, resulting in a ACT against PEACE; DISHONOR against the Martial Law and the Law of War, rendering the REFUSAL of the CR™ process a WAR CRIME that the United States is now REQUIRED by international obligations to prohibit; the one(s) acting as a such are now War Rebels.

The Notice of Relief from Surety along with the Assignment of the CR™ “process” via the Acceptance and Delivery of such with the Bill of Exchange COMPLETES delivery and TRANSFERS that duty to the United States for enforcement of its OBLIGATIONS as the CR™ “process” renders the Completed CR™ Contract into a DEBT OBLIGATION of the United States under Title 18 USC § 8 for enforcement of the peace, securing one’s person under Constitutional Duty.

~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.