Reply – Re: apologies and more information on the CR(tm) "process" from Skype
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: apologies and more information on the CR(tm) "process" from Skype
— by liberated liberated
What I am comprehending or concluding the request or conditional acceptance for "proof of claim" is not asking for evidence/facts/proof that a contract exists or some incident took place but "proof of claim" meaning where is the breach of peace? The acceptance being, we are not questioning the debt (non belligerent) and we merely are the pass through without interference so they can do what they do. The acceptance is the evidence of peace.  Is this correct?

I kept thinking when one does acceptance with proof of claim the respondent can come back with perhaps all kinds of proof or evidence of a contract/statute/whatever so what good is any amount other then it is a novation. Then I got silent and stopped thinking and what showed up....If I've accepted, for value or with a postal money order, where now is the peace being interrupted? I would be merely a part of the circuit that assists to discharge by grounding (man on the land) the charge back to peace.  It's all about peace   John Lennon knew something