While it was beneficial to try and enhance my comprehension, a red flag or two popped up under the q. & a. section as there were many references to the RV/Dinar/Dong debacle, so it kinda makes me question their motives, rightly or wrongly.
Maybe that's just ME. [It's a moot point at the moment as the more I read seems to have the effect of just making me even more confused and unsure. I'm getting further away from taking any steps to correct my status.]
I'm mistrustful of much info. just now [present company not included, as I've no desire to upset or insult anyone.]
Having read this thread, I've just realised that many hours of listening to Talkshoes [Legal Deception] by Shewolf & Tryal et al sharing their perspective on the importance of the name change decree, it appears that 'it ain't necessarily so.'
So, is it gonna be a case of "Don't © the signature" [not mentioned on this forum, as far as I'm aware; however, a process that some seem to be doing] followed by "Don't ™/℠/® the NAME" or "dba/anc" it?
I do get that it's an untrodden path that pioneers are clearing the way of, and that there's inevitably going to be some wrong turns taken.
And, no...just to clarify -not whining, simply sharing.
A crença e a descrença têm dividida a humanidade em tantas seitas, cegando os seus olhos à visão da unicidade de toda a vida.
Belief and disbelief have divided mankind into so many sects, blinding its eyes to the vision of the oneness of all life.
Hazrat Inayat Khan