Reply – Re: why the paperwork?
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: why the paperwork?
— by Fathers son Fathers son
I feel your frustration my brother, for not all can see as you and I.   its all real yet its not and fake. if you can comprehend this then you are there. or if you can see that all is you and your hearts desires.  literally you heart creates your surrondings.   now you say how. law of attraction. gods laws. you manifest your hearts intent through the fire into creation.    ones paperwork also shows the intent of the author.  so your claim will show your true intent.  common law have fun in that enviroement.  no remedy for you there. read gibsons under the difference between law and equity. wait. ill post it for you

§132.SuitsinChanceryContrastedwithActionsatLaw.—AlitigationintheChanceryCourtisproperlytermeda"suit,'7whileacontestinaCourtoflawisproperlydenominatedan"action."1Thepartywhoinstitutesapro-ceedinginaCourtoflawisordinarilycalled''plaintiff,''whilehewhobeginsasuitinaCourtofChanceryisgenerallycalled"complainant."Thepersonsuediscalled''defendant,''ineachCourt,unlessherespondstoadiscoveryinChancery,inwhichcaseheissometimesdenominated"respondent."InaCourtoflawanactionisbegunbyfilingabondforcostsandsuingoutasum-mons,butinaCourtofChancfiryasuitiscommencedbyfilingabill,thecostbondnotbeingessentialtothebeginningofasuit,asitisintheCircuitCourt.InaCourtoflaw,thefirstpleadingisadeclarationfiledatthereturnterm,couchedinformalandtechnicalphraseology,fullofbombasticverbosity,andteemingwithblood-curdlingdescriptionsofimaginarybarbaritiesinflictedbythewickeddefendant,upontheinnocentandoutragedplaintiff;whileinChancery,thebillisfiledbeforethesubpoenaissues,andisordinarilyaplainstatement,inordinarylanguage,ofcomplainant'srightsinthepremises,andoftheirretention,orviolation,orthreatenedviolation,bythedefendant.In-deed,abillwouldbecorrectlyphrasedwhichdescribedthegroundsofsuitinthemannerandlanguagewhichoneunprofessionalpersonwoulduseinwritingaboutthemtoanother;andsuchwasthecharacterandframeofbillsintheearlyhistoryoftheCourt.2Inanactionatlaw,theevidenceismainlygivenbywitnessesexaminedorallyinopenCourt;whereas,inaChancerysuit,theevidenceismainlycon-tainedindepositionstakeninvacation.InanactionatlawtheissuesoffactraisedbythepleadingsareordinarilydecidedbyajuryunderinstructionsbytheJudge,whileinChancerytheissuesoffactareordinarilyheardandde-terminedbytheChancellor.ACourtoflawregardsforms,rules,andprecedents,whileaCourtofChanceryregardsthecircumstancesofthecase,ignoresiorms,andprefersgoodreasonandgoodconsciencetorulesandprecedents.Inanactionatlaw,thedecision,istermeda"judgment,"ariditeitherawardsasumofmoneyorthepossessionofpropertytotheplaintiff,ortaxestheplain-tiffwiththecostsofthesuit;whilethedecisioninaChancerysuitiscalleda''decree,''2aanditmaynotonlyawardmoneyorpropertytooneormoreofthecomplainants,butmayatthesametimeawardmoneyorpropertytooneormoreofthedefendants,ormayrequireapartytodosomeparticularact,ormayprohibithimfromdoingsomeparticularact,andmaytaxanyofthepartieswiththecosts,ormaydividethecostsamongtheparties.Inanactionatlaw,allpropertytosatisfyajudgmentissoldbytheSheriffunderanexecution,andhereceivesandpaysoverthemoney;butinaChancerysuit,thesalesofproperty,andespeciallyrealproperty,areusuallymadebytheClerkandMaster,andconfirmedbytheChancellor,andtheproceedsofthesalearepaidoutbytheClerkandMaster.Inanactionatlaw,anequitableinterestinpropertyisnotcognizable,andanequitycannotbeleviedonorsold:whereas,inChancery,equitableinterestsaredealtwith,andmaybesold,ortransferred,orconvertedintoalegalestate.AndthereliefsthetwoCourtsgrantareverydissimilar.Courtsoflawhaveadistinctformofactiontoredresseachwrongandasserteachright;whereas,inChanceryseveralwrpngsmayberedressedandseveralrightsas-sertedinoneandthesamesuit.Thus,inthesamesuittheChanceryCourtmay:1,staywaste;2,impoundtheproceedsofthewaste;3,awarddamagesforthewastecommitted;4,adjudgethelandtothecomplainant;5,givehimadecreeforbackrents,and6,puthiminpossessionoftheproperty;whereas,alawCourtwouldrequirefourdifferentactions,andaninjunctioninChancerybesides,toaccomplishthesameresults.Inanactionatlawtheplaintiffmustsueforeitherpropertyormoney;inasuitinChancerythecomplainantmaysueforboththepropertyanditsmoneyvalue,inthealternative,andifhe-failtogetthepropertytheCourtwillinapropercase,awardamoneyequivalent.Inanactionatlawyougetwhatthelawallows,inasuitinChanceryyougetwhatisjustandright,accordingtoEquityandgoodconscience.Thelawmayberight,Equityisrightitself.3§133.HowaSuitinChanceryisCommenced.

forgive the spacing. was copied and pasted