– Re: Info from Top Court Clerk/Registrar
In Reply To
#38 Private property, unless forfeited by crimes or by offenses of the owner, can be seized only by way of military necessity, for the support or other benefit of the Army or of the United States. If the owner has not fled, the commanding officer will cause receipts to be given, which may serve the spoliated owner to obtain indemnity.
Whether one uses the Lieber Code version or the Cestui Que version, the issue comes down to a false claim of property that one does not own, thus consenting to be surety. It makes sense there is a penalty for making such claim. With that said, the name or property itself is part of an "internal system" call it HM or the United States. The debtor and creditor is one of the same, which makes sense because in accounting, the debits must equal the credits. It is our "intermeddling in the infant's estate" OR the INTERNAL business without specific [as opposed to general] authority to screw up the "accounting" which forces the system to hold us liable for the system's property. As man is a conduit to operate the "internal system" for the benefit of HM or the United States, and here is the $100 question, when ONE steps up to the plate and says to the public official, "I have not fled, I am here alive and well AND I AM WILLING to honor: "And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor", WHAT DO I NEED TO DO TO FULFILL MY WILL AND DISIRE TO HELP YOU AND YOUR INTERNAL SYSTEM OUT, JUST DO NOT ASK ME TO PARTICIPATE ACTIVELY IN IT,
And still we get no response?
Thank you all for posting the info. However, and to me it is 6 of one or half dozen of the other, this is basically consistent with Article 38 of the Lieber Code.