Reply – Another puzzle piece? Intangible property rights.
Your Name
or Cancel
In Reply To
Another puzzle piece? Intangible property rights.
— by alentejo angel alentejo angel
Offering this for consideration, for those who may not be aware of it.
References: The Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem
Superior Court of the District of Columbia [est. 1971] dealing with Foreign Estate Proceedings - International Court (1972 Bretton Woods agreement gone!)
Referenced at 16m 14s - own city state/own country.
Didn't take any tangible property, but intangible property rights to it.
A crença e a descrença têm dividida a humanidade em tantas seitas, cegando os seus olhos à visão da unicidade de toda a vida.

Belief and disbelief have divided mankind into so many sects, blinding its eyes to the vision of the oneness of all life.

Hazrat Inayat Khan