This is post is done with apologies for the listeners over on County Assembly 2009. I was scheduled for a webinar last Thursday, but forgot and made other plans. I did get on the show for about 30 min or so, but I feel like I was rushed and failed to provide anything tangible, just overview. I know people had questions for the last 3 weeks regarding child custody and such and during my reply to the moderator of this webinar this is what came about. I know this is centric to custody issues, but with a little tweak in the understanding of the operation of this method, I am sure others shall find other applications.
To be implimented in conjunction with acceptance of both International Convention of Civil and Political Rights and Treaty of Peace and Amnity of 1814 (Ghent)
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE LEO XIII
ON CAPITAL AND LABOR
Paternal authority can be neither abolished nor absorbed by the State; for it has the same source as human life itself. "The child belongs to the father," and is, as it were, the continuation of the father's personality; and speaking strictly, the child takes its place in civil society, not of its own right, but in its quality as member of the family in which it is born. And for the very reason that "the child belongs to the father" it is, as St. Thomas Aquinas says, "before it attains the use of free will, under the power and the charge of its parents." The socialists, therefore, in setting aside the parent and setting up a State supervision, act against natural justice, and destroy the structure of the home.
So, when the people get their abstract of trust filed into the county along with the UCC-1 and get a certified copy out of the record, now they can make claim to the TRUST PROPERTY as the father of the son(s) and the mother of the daughter(s). If one spouse is deceased, the other inherits. If the spouses are arguing (custody battle), the one with the TRUST in place wins: you can also use the parable of King Solomon and the two women who are fighting over the daughter.
Put the certified copy into the court record along with a copy of the Authenticated BC (although I do not even think it has to be authenticated as the BC has 3 signatures, the informant, the doctor, and the receiving registrar which creates a trust), the section above from the RERUM NOVARUM and the "prayer for relief":
From the beginning with god as my witness, I, FirstName, true wo/man of god, acknowledge all blessings given by God, repent all transgressions against God, and waive all claims without God and My interests were taken at birth; held in trust for safekeeping, and being born again in Christ, I claim my House in His Kingdom and require unlimited provisions as well as safe conduct and innocent passage on His Earth and amongst all nations.
I believe you all are holding my property interest and I have come to recover and release those interests. Who here has a superior claim to the one I just presented?
From the beginning with god as my witness, I, FirstName, true wo/man of god, acknowledge all blessings given by God, repent all transgressions against God, and waive all claims without God and stand here for this matter for My interests were taken at birth; held in trust for safekeeping, and being born again in Christ, I claim my House in His Kingdom and require unlimited provisions as well as safe conduct and innocent passage on His Earth and amongst all nations.
I believe you all are holding my property interest (hold up son/daughter BC) and I have come to recover and release those interests. Who here has a superior claim to the one I just presented?
If anyone says anything: do the last part of the 4 corners (do you have a claim against me? ... etc) and then REPEAT the claim VERBALLY.
We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.
If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.
By *not* doing the reversion, most everyone is perceived as an "immigrant" for all intents.
Or something of that nature. Which is what allows the forces of status quo control to
essentially "have their way" with whoever failed to ro complete the reversion.
Am I even close to being right in my perception, Boris?