Turnabout is Fair Play "Novation Remedy" - suggestion only

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
Locked 1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Turnabout is Fair Play "Novation Remedy" - suggestion only

iamsomedude
Administrator
posted Mar 05, 2016 by some_dude
I just made this up, so take it with a grain of salt and due your due diligence and please do not ask for any paperwork for people need to write from their own comprehension instead of others'

You can either accept the offer or let them acquire a "Default judgement" and then and then novate the offer/order by offering to pay $1 postal money order every month upon the FACT of an actual claim otherwise all there stands is FORCE, which is a declaration of war for the greatest enemy of peace is force and wrong and if all one has is FORCE, then there really is no RIGHT, which means there is an ENFORCED WRONG which is now admission of an enemy of peace and now the one enforcing the order or seeking the claim stands as a "belligerent occupant of office" using this "authority" as DE FACTO TRUSTEE within the host nation for private profit and gain just doing his JOB

(JOB: a definitive piece of work for which one is employed at a fixed price of which one is required to undertake an affair regarding a piece of public or official business for the purpose of mismanaging it for private gain and whomever is doing the job, does so with fine skill and craftsmanship ... in other words, the duty of one in public office to engage in child molestation and abuse resulting from infant sex trafficking through forced commercial intercourse for private profit and gain and all done under the guise of protection of national security)

And since "just doing my JOB" is NOT a valid excuse, then international law stands violated under Nuremberg by the one seeking the claim and the one enforcing the claim: thus conspiracy to commit war under the guise of "flying a false flag", of which is just "piracy, rape, pillage and plunder" of which ALL are formally forbidden under the rules of the war that was just declared, thus the enforcement of the order becomes a WAR CRIME without FACTS IN SUPPORT of the CLAIM/ORDER and of which has been OUTLAWED by the Vatican regarding its INTERESTS, of which that PERSON is a Vatican Interest: juridical person REPRESENTING the estate of man held in trust until such time as that one comes forth via expression of his will: Christ Consciousness ... the second coming of Christ.

In fact, all court orders operate in EXACTLY the same manner as all courtrooms are just "civil war battlefields" and all these guys holding and exercising "duties under office" are just under UN Contract to keep the peace, not use their positions of power and authority in the host nation for private profit against the citizens and inhabitants of the host nation for "the authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country (Article 43 of the Hague)"

Since the order without FACT is a declaration of WAR, then the judge of whom issued the order is now an BELLIGERENT OCCUPANT of the office and now stands liable under that "position of power and authority" to "restore and ensure public order and safety while respecting the laws in force in the country" and the Statutes at Large more commonly called 12 USC 95a (2) are the EVIDENCE of the laws in force and effect within the several states ...

So, now the judge either shows where he is "absolutely prevented" or the judge just engaged in a WAR CRIME as a co-conspirator under Nuremberg and now the PERSON one uses is a POW suffering injury at the hands of a "official or officer" in DISHONOR of the receipt issued by the Commanding Officer: the Birth Certificate.

This is turnabout, of which is ALWAYS FAIR PLAY. We occupy the "office of person" and then start arguing and such, thus become "belligerent occupant" of that office and thus subject to "punishment" under Lieber Code and other international treaties and such and slapped with a "SANCTION" ... If this is the case, then the reverse is also true, if we demand PROOF OF FACT and that PROOF is lacking, then the one making the claim or enforcing some order is now in a State of Belligerency and thus occupies their Office as a belligerent and the same rules apply.

"Snoop on them as they snoop on us" - Hackers, 2000
[Last edited Mar 05, 2016]
~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.
~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.