How would one create a business under this paradigm?

Previous Topic Next Topic
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view

How would one create a business under this paradigm?

Could someone describe how you would go about creating a business? If I want to mass produce water filters for the world ...can you describe how the operation gets started?  How do you interact with commerce?

I'm not talking about making a profit. But creating an entity that can provide a benefit to humanity in perpetuity.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view

Re: How would one create a business under this paradigm?

Business means commerce, so if you're in business you're in commerce. That said are you going to sell the water filters or give them away? How will you fund the making of the water filters and getting the word out?
Depending upon your approach the powers to be may step in and create havoc if you go the route of others that had invented free energy generators and had their documents seized, or they were locked up or mysteriously found dead.
On the other hand if treasury is going to receive any residual might be a different story.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view

Re: How would one create a business under this paradigm?

This post was updated on .
In reply to this post by ian
And that is how it will work for that is the purpose for which corporations were originally intended, but right now, we got some hearts and minds to straighten out. OK?

It wasn't until the usury-banking system that corporations became "for profit" which really means "collectors of the usury interest" or "tax collectors for the King's Treasury" so the bankers interests could be paid for that is what is taxed: use of the private bank notes to run commerce.

Step-father and mother were in the "Name Game" back in the 80's-90's. They would get mailing lists from phone rooms and other sources and sell them to others; highly profitable. He once told me: "All I want is my 2 cents from each name" ... that is same with the Private Bankers; All they want is their 2 cents per transaction of which is usury and that is what "tax" has become: servicing the benefit of usury: Taxes used to ensure the functions of the nation; now they just go to insure the profits of usury.

Remember: united States of America is an Entrusted Nation of Kings created within the sphere of the Law of Nations and ALL NATIONS are bound to uphold, defend, and protect; relying upon divine Providence with a common Treasury "funded" by a PLEDGE: And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor

Commerce itself; not evil.
Commerce when using someone else's "currency" than the Kingdom's; evil.

Supplier of the currency = salvage beneficiary via LIEN RIGHT via subrogation as supplier of "currency" making that party "naked owner" for surety salvage rights supersedes all other claims; since "money" is basically just the "monetization of a lien right" using the "estate in expectancy" of the "naked owner" as the "underwriter," then "money" = insurance contract to underwrite and guarantee possession, which means the one using "money" is usfructuary and if you doubt, just go look at the duties of the usufructuary and ask yourself: "when I "buy" something, does all of this apply to me?"


Because the use of someone else's "currency" means the one who supplied it now "owns" the product of the transaction via LIEN RIGHT; subrogation, until such time as the one that used the "currency" returns the same; the one of whom acquired it in commerce is nothing but the usufructuary; the one of whom supplied the currency is the naked owner (ie: fee owner) ...

and now you know WHY it appears that commerce is "evil": the people have been using "Satan's currency" (ie: Private Federal Reserve Bank Notes) of which is obtained thru "blood sacrifice" (ie: backed by FORCE) thus those interests are serviced and protected by the Trust (ie: United States and all the States: LORD of Hosts) for those are the ONLY interests within the Trust since the people FORSOOK "the pledge" of the Declaration by "trading with the enemy" : Force and Wrong as the "Federal Reserve Note"; aka "Petro Dollar," is a usury system backed by force of arms (ie: against nature) and each time we partake of such, we are actually fornicating with the Whore, supporting the EXPANSION of the Kingdom of Satan, thus REPUDIATING the Kingdom of Heaven WITHIN the Treasury.

REPUDIATE = Divorce; reject, renounce, abandon, give up, turn one's back on, disown, cast off, lay aside; forswear, abjure; forsake 

Simple as this: each time a bill or demand for performance came to one; one serviced it, thus REPUDIATING the pledge of the Declaration by one's own actions (ie: 31 USC 3713(b)); akin to Forsaking God and rejecting Christ, thus WE chose to eat the fruit of the poisonous tree because of our IGNORANCE; we were LACKING KNOWLEDGE: knowledge of God in our Heart and his good graces; lost sheep (ie: the lost and scattered tribes).

But once we were lost; now we are found and now EQUITY (ie: His Amazing Grace) can assist us since now we take the steps to correct our past mistakes so our future does not inherit this empty way of life.

Amazing Grace

Amazing Grace, How sweet the sound
That saved a wretch like me
I once was lost, but now am found
T'was blind but now I see

T'was Grace that taught my heart to fear
And Grace, my fears relieved
How precious did that grace appear
The hour I first believed

Through many dangers, toils and snares
We have already come.
T'was grace that brought us safe thus far
And grace will lead us home,
And grace will lead us home

Amazing grace, Howe Sweet the sound
That saved a wretch like me
I once was lost but now am found
T'was blind but now I see

Was blind, but now I see.

~ Boris

We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.

If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.